Abstract
- Each the iPhone 17 Air and Galaxy S25 Edge are anticipated to compromise on battery life in change for thinness.
- That is a step backwards, contemplating that nobody is asking for thinner telephones, but persons are all the time asking for extra runtime.
- It might be that the telephones are a needed step in the direction of a greater future, however as rumored, they will not be getting my cash.
It seems like
iPhone 17
rumors are hitting continuous nowadays, which is sensible — we’re about 4 months out from launch, so {hardware} particulars must be locked down forward of mass manufacturing. It takes fairly some time to churn out the thousands and thousands of items Apple must fulfill worldwide launch demand.
The most recent rumor (through The Information), is that with the intention to obtain its ultra-thin 5.5mm physique, the
iPhone 17 Air
will sport a critical compromise in battery life. How a lot? Allegedly, Apple’s inside testing means that simply 60 to 70% of householders will be capable to make it a full day on a single cost, down from about 80 to 90% for different iPhone fashions. The corporate is even mentioned to be getting ready a brand new battery case, one thing it hasn’t supplied for the reason that discontinued MagSafe Battery Pack.
Comparable rumors have emerged round Samsung’s
Galaxy S25 Edge
. In keeping with WinFuture, the telephone could have a 3,900mAh battery — that is extra capability than the iPhone 16, however under the common S25’s 4,000mAh, and far lower than the S25 Extremely’s 5,000mAh. That is put me off each Samsung and Apple’s upcoming “vanguard” telephones, and never simply because everybody prefers greater numbers.
Associated
Is the iPhone 15 still worth buying in 2025? The answer is complicated
Presumably, however you should not get one straight from Apple.
Dealing with the established order
As a tech journalist, I could be an exception, however I discover that almost all telephones nonetheless haven’t got sufficient battery life, by no means thoughts rolling issues again. My present every day driver is an iPhone 16 Professional, which in accordance with Apple, needs to be able to as much as 22 hours of (streaming) video playback. Sounds spectacular, proper? In follow, nonetheless, I am struggling to think about how that could possibly be doable. I wish to placed on Reuters’ video briefing whereas I bathe and alter within the morning, and I am going to typically see the battery drop to 90% or decrease earlier than I even get downstairs for breakfast. On exercise days, it is doable for the battery to dip under 30% by the point I get into mattress, and that is after a 15- to 16-hour day of principally non-video exercise. If I really spent an hour or two streaming YouTube, I would in all probability should put my telephone in Low Energy Mode sooner or later.
This yr, it looks as if each Apple and Samsung are engaged on the belief that we’ll be wowed by thinness, which is a mistake.
I would say it is baffling that Apple and Samsung seem like headed within the incorrect path, however actually, it isn’t. Each corporations have lengthy put different upgrades forward of battery life. It’s, in concept, doable to make it over a day for those who’ve bought a telephone just like the Galaxy S25 Extremely or iPhone 16 Professional Max, however solely with gentle utilization. Certainly, battery life has all the time performed second fiddle for many smartphone makers, just because larger batteries are costly whereas being robust to take advantage of in advertising and marketing campaigns. A 6.9-inch display or a 10X telephoto lens is straight away spectacular — it is tougher to wow individuals with an additional two or three hours of runtime.
This yr, it looks as if each Apple and Samsung are engaged on the belief that we’ll be wowed by thinness, which is a mistake. It should entice some individuals, actually, however we’re not within the 2000s anymore — telephones have been skinny for a very long time. Nobody I do know is complaining about thickness. If something, the problem appears to be that telephones have turn out to be unwieldly, getting thinner whereas concurrently rising taller, wider, and slipperier. Steel and glass could also be good aesthetically — however with no case, skinny gadgets like my iPhone and my spouse’s OnePlus 9 5G really feel like they might slip out of my palms with one incorrect gesture.

Associated
The OnePlus 13R shows OnePlus still needs to figure out budget phones
So near finances nirvana, but to this point.
A worrisome path for the longer term
Misusing the newest tech
Each the iPhone 17 Air and S25 Edge could also be primarily based on silicon-carbon batteries, a variation of the lithium-ion batteries we’re used to, merely with greater vitality density. That hasn’t been confirmed, however the tech has been utilized in a number of telephones already, and now appears poised to go mainstream.
In that case, I am anxious {that a} unhealthy precedent is rising. After I first heard about silicon-carbon, my hope was that we would get extra longevity out of telephones the identical dimension, or no less than equal longevity from barely smaller gadgets. Ought to the Air and Edge show profitable, we could possibly be hit with a wave of copycat gadgets, a few of which can additionally throw battery life below the bus. That may take the trade backward at a time when persons are extra depending on smartphones than ever.
To be honest, Apple and Samsung could also be attempting to maintain elements prices down and retail costs in verify. Silicon-carbon batteries are costlier to provide for the time being, so even attempting to match the capacities of ordinary lithium-ion batteries could also be troublesome with no chunk into revenue margins. It could possibly be that when manufacturing prices come down, we’ll see capacities go up once more, fulfilling the brand new tech’s promise. Who is aware of — perhaps Apple will really ship a two-day iPhone sooner or later.
Ought to the Air and Edge show profitable, we’ll inevitably be hit with a wave of copycat gadgets, a few of which can additionally throw battery life below the bus.
Alongside these strains, I am hopeful that each the Air and the Edge will serve a function just like the iPhone X, which Apple launched in 2017. This was the primary iPhone with an OLED show and a
Face ID
digital camera, costing a then-unprecedented $999. Many individuals balked at it, however gross sales of the iPhone X, iPhone XS, and iPhone 11 Professional finally pushed manufacturing prices down, making it doable to place each OLED and Face ID on the $799 iPhone 12. Today, even the $599
iPhone 16e
shares these options.
Time will inform how briskly the brand new battery tech bridges over to helpful capacities at reasonably priced costs, if it does in any respect. I simply know that for now, Apple and Samsung can depend me out of gadgets that cut back battery life with none tangible advantages. It will hardly matter how cool a telephone seems sliding out of my pocket if I am unable to make it to the gymnasium and again with out plugging into my automobile — or from Alberta to Texas with no battery pack or charging through the flight’s layover. I assume I am going to nonetheless be bringing my iPad alongside for mid-flight leisure.

You may additionally like
Everything you need to know about PEVs, or personal electric vehicles
You should use PEVs to discover, run errands, or velocity up your commute.
Trending Merchandise

HP 27h Full HD Monitor – Diagonal ̵...

HP Notebook Laptop, 15.6″ HD Touchscree...

ASUS Vivobook Go 15.6” FHD Laptop computer,...

HP Portable Laptop, Student and Business, 14&...

Sceptre Curved 24-inch Gaming Monitor 1080p R...
